EPD direct ownership vs AMLP-style ETF — 20-year side-by-side tax comparison.
This tool provides projections based on assumptions. It does not constitute tax, legal, or investment advice. Consult a qualified CPA or financial advisor before making decisions based on this output.
Comparison: $50,000 invested in EPD direct vs AMLP-style ETF
Direct: 1,333 EPD units. ETF: 0.87% expense ratio, 21% C-corp tax drag, 80% qualified dividends. Tax: 32% bracket, MFJ, NIIT. 20-year horizon.
Direct EPD holding produces $28,536 more over 20 years, even after accounting for K-1 complexity. The §199A deduction and §1014 estate step-up make direct ownership the clear winner.
The ETF column models fund-level corporate tax and fully-taxable dividend distributions. Real MLP ETFs distribute a large share as return of capital (tax-deferred until you sell), which this comparison does not credit — it therefore favors direct ownership. The expense ratio is currently deducted from both distributions and appreciation; a model correction is planned.
Compare your own MLP vs ETF in the Portfolio Simulator →
Computed by lucasandersen.ai MLP Tax Simulator v0.1.0. 2026-07-03. Not tax advice.
The wrapper drag separating a direct MLP from AMLP compounds the same deferred-tax edge — see that edge quantified by MLP archetype.